top of page
Search
Writer's picturethelila500
Oct 26, 20223 min read

Is The Death Penalty Justified In India?

The execution of a person sentenced to death after being found guilty by a court of law of a criminal offense is known as capital punishment, commonly known as the death penalty. It is the harshest punishment a defendant can receive. It is often awarded in cases of murder, rape, betrayal, etc. that is the most atrocious.


The death sentence is seen as the most suitable punishment and greatest deterrence for the worst crimes. But those who disagree with it think it's cruel. As a result, the morality of the death penalty is questionable, and many criminologists and socialists around the world have long called for its abolishment. But there was always a discussion and arguments were held up regarding this concern. You can gain the best guidance and knowledge from a Criminal Lawyers In Hyderabad.

Arguments in favour of the death penalty

  • Retribution: One of the main principles of retribution is that people should receive their rightful rewards in proportion to the gravity of their misdeeds. According to this reasoning, true justice necessitates that wrongdoers endure pain and suffering that is commensurate to the offense. Every criminal should face the consequences of their actions, and a murderer should be executed.

  • Deterrence: The justification for the death penalty is sometimes based on the idea that by putting convicted murderers to death, we will stop future murderers from killing people.

  • The death sentence is frequently defended as giving victims' families closure.

  • There are numerous instances of people who were sentenced to death using the opportunity before their execution to confess their sins, show regret, and frequently undergo deep spiritual rehabilitation.

Arguments against the death penalty

  • Due to a mental disorder or physical disability, some of the people who were executed would not have been able to be discouraged.

  • Some people who commit capital crimes are so distraught that they fail to consider the consequences.

  • Since 2013 (Section 376A of the IPC), the death penalty has been authorized in rape cases. Despite this, the rapes continue to occur, and their brutality has multiplied. This makes one consider if the death penalty is a useful deterrent against crime.

  • The most prevalent defense against the death penalty is that, sooner or later, innocent individuals may perish as a result of errors or weaknesses in the legal system.

  • People who reject the death penalty believe that punishment is evil and is simply a refined form of vengeance.

The death sentence is still less expensive than life in prison without the possibility of parole, according to supporters, despite the costs to the government associated with carrying it out. Although there is little argument that the cost of the former is significant, life incarceration is cumulatively more expensive due to the expenditures of food, healthcare, and other expenses associated with maintaining the lives of prisoners serving life sentences.

Criminal Lawyers In Kolkata who support the death penalty give examples of how the use of the death penalty or its abolition has impacted crime rates. Research done in the late 1960s found that the years after this law was repealed had a 7% increase in crime. On the other hand, fewer crimes were committed as a result of the rise in the number of death row inmates who were put to death each year. These numbers, according to supporters, show unequivocally how effective the death penalty is at preventing crimes. The lack of the death penalty is correlated with a rise in crime.


According to Time magazine, there are an estimated 2,000,000 victims of crimes in the US, ranging from assault to murder. Because of the lax penalties and flaws in the legal system, criminals become more reckless and daring to commit horrible crimes when there are insufficient laws to address the issue or the lack of teeth in these laws. These factors make the death penalty necessary.


According to a death row inmate's Criminal Lawyer In Rohini Court, the pain of the execution is not implausible. Even the Eighth Amendment objection, which contended that the medicine used to put the defendant in a coma-like state before administering the lethal drug was unable to do so completely, was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court was adamant in its position that any method of execution will undoubtedly cause some suffering, and states that still use the death penalty have already established more humane techniques for carrying them out. For more information about the. Death penalty you can directly reach out to lead India we have the best experience staff looking to help you.


Call Us: - +91-8800788535

2 views0 comments

Comments

Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page